Earth & Water - Abnormal Organism
This is an idea I’ve been discussing since 2020 and have written about in Earth & Water. As we move closer to Part II of Earth & Water in these blogs, which makes up the bulk of the book, I want to pose an important question: What is normal? Many people think they have a solid grasp of this concept, but I believe it's worth questioning. In many ways, our understanding of "normal" remains incomplete and unexplored.
As we look at research focused on understanding life and the natural world, it's important to consider that our findings might be influenced by factors we haven’t fully accounted for. One such factor is the way insulation in modern life affects the natural electrical grounding of organisms. This disruption in grounding could have a significant impact on our perception of what constitutes "normal" physiological functioning. In fact, it might challenge some of the very assumptions our current knowledge is based on.
In today’s world, where people are increasingly detached from nature, we need to ask: what do we mean when we say "normal"? If humans in their natural state are meant to be electrically grounded, then living in insulated environments means we’ve drifted away from that natural equilibrium. This disconnect can have major consequences because it suggests that much of what we think we know about human physiology might be based on skewed data, collected from insulated organisms.
Rethinking What We Know About Normalcy
With this realization in mind, it’s important to reevaluate the way we conduct research and the assumptions underlying it. If we want to truly understand the complexities of life and the balance that keeps organisms functioning properly, we need to bridge the gap between our insulated lifestyle and the naturally grounded state that life evolved with. By looking back to the natural context in which life developed, we might start to see inconsistencies in the conclusions we’ve drawn from our current perspective.
This calls for a shift in the way we approach scientific inquiry. Instead of relying solely on artificially created environments, we need to put more focus on studying the natural world in its unaltered form. This shift toward a more grounded approach to research can provide fresh insights into the fundamental principles governing human physiology and life in general.
Organism’s levels of inflammation or electron depletion can differ significantly based on how insulated they are from the Earth's surface. Many people only come into contact with the Earth's electrons when they take a shower, assuming the water is delivered through metal pipes connected to the ground. Someone who is electron-depleted might look and feel "normal" but could heal more slowly or show different patterns in disease recovery and aging compared to someone who is grounded.
Research on Lab Animals: A Skewed View
A great deal of research has been conducted on laboratory animals, like Wistar rats, which are considered genetically and physiologically similar to humans. But studies have shown significant variations between these animals. To add to that, the physiological condition and behavior of lab animals can change depending on whether they’re grounded and how close they are to electrical sources. These differences can have a big impact on study outcomes and can make it harder to replicate results across different labs.
When the human body is grounded, physiological processes become more balanced, as every part of the body aligns with the Earth's electrical potential. This stabilization of the body’s electrical environment impacts all regulatory processes. Variability between research outcomes could be reduced if experimental animals were provided with a standardized electrical environment. To ensure these animals are truly healthy and "normal," their cages should be grounded and kept away from electrical wiring, especially in studies that focus on recovery from injuries or diseases.
Researchers should recognize that the animals they use in experiments may have different immune responses based on whether or not they are grounded. It’s common practice for researchers to document the methods and specific animal strains they use, assuming that animals of the same strain are genetically and physiologically similar. However, studies comparing Sprague-Dawley rats, which are derived from Wistar rats, found substantial differences in tumor development across labs.. differing electrical environments could be a contributing factor.
Hidden Variables in Research
The material of the animals' cages, whether or not the cages are grounded, and how close they are to electrical wiring can all influence immune responses. These variables are often overlooked but can drastically affect study outcomes, making it harder to reproduce results. There’s a pressing need for standardized electrical environments in research. Grounding conditions and electron saturation levels in experimental animals can have a significant impact on their physiological and immune responses, as we’ll explore more deeply in Earth & Water.
Establishing standardized electrical environments in research would minimize confounding variables and allow for more accurate assessments of physiological processes. This would lead to a clearer understanding of the factors governing life and its complexities. Grounding experimental animals in a consistent way would help researchers better compare their findings, leading to more robust advancements in the field.
Redefining "Normal"
This discussion brings us back to our key question: what is normal? When we think about grounding and its effect on living organisms, the idea of "normal" becomes more complicated. What’s considered normal in one electrical environment may not be the same in another. The physiological and immunological state of an organism might be thought of as normal in one setting but could change dramatically in a different electrical environment.
To truly define what "normal" is, we need to factor in the electrical environments that organisms are exposed to and work to establish a baseline that reflects their natural, grounded state. This will help us better understand the relationship between life and the electrical environment that surrounds it.
Beyond Grounding: The Impact of Artificial Light
In this discussion, we’ve focused mainly on the electrical aspects of what defines a "normal" organism, especially how grounding affects physiological balance. But we haven’t yet considered the effects of another major factor—artificial light. The disruption of natural circadian rhythms by artificial lighting and the effects of light on biochemical processes must also be taken into account when defining what’s normal.
To fully appreciate the factors that influence normal physiological functioning, we need to integrate both grounding and light into our research. Only by considering these various influences can we begin to redefine what "normal" truly means in today’s world.
This entire discussion can be extrapolated even further, of course, beyond just the electrical environment and the impact of artificial light. Another critical question we must ask is: are we studying metabolically unhealthy animals and humans? In many cases, the organisms used in research might not be in their natural, optimal metabolic state. The way we feed, house, and expose organisms to artificial environments could all contribute to studying unhealthy, unnatural organisms, distorting our findings.
If you're interested in diving deeper into these concepts and understanding the broader implications, check out Earth & Water, where these ideas are explored in much greater detail.
Summary
This post explores the idea that our understanding of "normal" physiological functioning may be skewed due to the impact of modern environments, particularly insulation from the Earth’s natural electrical grounding and the influence of artificial light. It challenges conventional research practices, suggesting that the use of insulated animals and humans in studies may lead to flawed conclusions about what is considered normal. The post highlights the need for standardized electrical environments in scientific research and calls for a reevaluation of what "normal" means in the context of natural grounding.
The discussion also touches on how artificial light disrupts circadian rhythms, further complicating our understanding of health and normalcy. Additionally, it questions whether we are studying metabolically unhealthy animals and humans, potentially leading to the examination of unhealthy, unnatural organisms.